Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. STEFAN D. NICHOLS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Motion for permission to file and serve a supplemental record on appeal, to vacate this Court's memorandum and order entered May 3, 2024 (People v Nichols, 227 AD3d 1443 [4th Dept 2024]), and for entry of a new memorandum and order after consideration of the supplemental record, be and the same hereby is granted to the extent that defendant is granted permission to file and serve a supplemental record on appeal containing County Court's complete decision and order dated April 11, 2023, this Court's memorandum and order entered May 3, 2024 (People v Nichols, 227 AD3d 1443 [4th Dept 2024]) is vacated, and the following memorandum and order is substituted therefor:
Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Michael L. Dollinger, J.), dated April 11, 2023. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court should have granted his request for a downward departure from risk level three to risk level two. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant adequately identified mitigating circumstances that are, as a matter of law, of a kind or to a degree not adequately taken into account by the Guidelines and proved their existence by a preponderance of the evidence (see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]), we conclude, based upon the totality of the circumstances, that a downward departure is not warranted (see People v Burgess, 191 AD3d 1256, 1257 [4th Dept 2021]; see generally Gillotti, 23 NY3d at 861).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: MOTION NO. (237 /24) KA 23-00841.
Decided: March 14, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)