Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: KENNETH W., Petitioner–Appellant, v. Suzanne MILES–GUSTAVE, etc., et al., Respondents–Respondents.
Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Erika M. Edwards, J.), entered November 14, 2023, denying the petition to annul the determination of respondent The New York State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS), dated February 16, 2023, which denied petitioner's request to amend and seal his record in the Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner did not sustain his burden of showing that OCFS's determination was arbitrary and capricious or unlawful as a matter of law. Amendments to the Social Services Law, effective January 1, 2022, create an “irrebuttable presumption in a fair hearing” that allegations in a report of child abuse or maltreatment have not been proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence where an article 10 Family Court proceeding based on the same allegations terminates in the subject's favor (Social Services Law § 422[8][b][ii]). OCFS declined to apply the irrebuttable presumption at petitioner's fair hearing, held after the amendments effective date, because petitioner had commenced his administrative appeal before the effective date. OCFS's decision was not irrational or unreasonable (Matter of Portocarrero v. Poole, 231 A.D.3d 498, 498, 218 N.Y.S.3d 53 [1st Dept. 2024]; Matter of Woodley v. Poole, 226 A.D.3d 461, 462, 209 N.Y.S.3d 352 [1st Dept. 2024]).
Petitioner's disagreement with this Court's holdings in Matter of Portocarrero and Matter of Woodley is insufficient to overcome stare decisis considerations (see Perella Weinberg Partners LLC v. Kramer, 226 A.D.3d 523, 524, 208 N.Y.S.3d 597 [1st Dept. 2024]). Moreover, the Court of Appeals has recently held that statutory amendments do not retroactively apply to OCFS determinations rendered before the effective date (see Jeter v. Poole, ––– N.Y.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, ––– N.E.3d ––––, 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 05868 [2024]).
We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3824
Decided: March 06, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)