Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KAPLAN, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. WEBMD HEALTH CORP., Defendant–Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lyle E. Frank, J.), entered July 2, 2024, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion denied in its entirety, and the matter converted to a plenary action and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
Supreme Court should not have granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint under CPLR 3213 on defendant's guaranty of the sublease between plaintiff as sublandlord and the nonparty subtenant. The parties’ dispute is intertwined with plaintiff's dispute with the subtenant over its obligations to perform certain restoration work under the sublease. Although it is well established that an unconditional guaranty of both payment and performance obligations in certain circumstances may give rise to relief under CPLR 3213, here, “this procedural avenue is foreclosed if the liabilities and obligations can only be ascertained by resort to evidence outside the instrument, or if more than simple proof of nonpayment or a de minimis deviation from the face of the document is involved” (Kerin v. Kaufman, 296 A.D.2d 336, 337, 745 N.Y.S.2d 22 [1st Dept. 2002]). Thus, because the guaranty permits the guarantor to raise payment and performance as a defense and there is a colorable dispute as to whether the amount due has been satisfied, CPLR 3213 relief is not available (see 549 LLC v. Luna, 219 A.D.3d 1209, 1209, 196 N.Y.S.3d 424 [1st Dept. 2023]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3838
Decided: March 06, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)