Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Roberto CORDERO, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Greater New York Council, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered April 24, 1998, which, upon the prior grant of the trial motions of defendants City of New York and New York City Board of Education to dismiss the complaint as against them for failure to establish a prima facie case, and, upon a jury verdict in favor of defendants Boy Scouts of America, Greater New York Council, and James Vila, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to plaintiffs' contentions, the trial court's rulings did not deprive them of a fair trial. The court properly denied plaintiffs' request to unseal the police reports (CPL 160.50; see, Matter of Joseph M., 82 N.Y.2d 128, 603 N.Y.S.2d 804, 623 N.E.2d 1154; Wilson v. City of New York, 240 A.D.2d 266, 659 N.Y.S.2d 8), and his counsel never moved for sanctions for defendants' purported failure to comply with discovery demands. The court also properly denied counsel's motion for a curative instruction after the summation of defendants' counsel.
Although the court erred in precluding one of plaintiffs' experts from testifying at trial, such error was harmless in light of the fact that plaintiffs introduced the testimony of another, similarly qualified child abuse expert and since the erroneously excluded expert testimony would not have affected the court's finding that the municipal defendants had no responsibility for supervising the scout troop in which the infant plaintiff was allegedly abused (see, People v. Hughes, 72 N.Y.2d 1035, 534 N.Y.S.2d 931, 531 N.E.2d 652, cert. denied 492 U.S. 908, 109 S.Ct. 3221, 106 L.Ed.2d 571).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 26, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)