Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MEA V. ORLEANS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; BRANDON V., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, respondent father appeals from an order that, inter alia, terminated his parental rights with respect to the subject child. The child was removed from the father's custody after the child suffered multiple rib fractures on at least three occasions and an injured lung in 2019 and, since the child's removal, no further injuries have occurred. We now affirm.
Contrary to the father's contention, on the record before us, petitioner established that the father “failed to plan appropriately for the child's future” (Matter of Jerikkoh W. [Rebecca W.], 134 AD3d 1550, 1551 [4th Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 903 [2016]) and, despite services rendered by petitioner, “gained no insight into [his] own behavior,” which led to the child's removal (Matter of Nathaniel T., 67 NY2d 838, 842 [1986]).
We also reject the father's contention that Family Court abused its discretion by denying his request for a suspended judgment because nothing in this record warrants “ ‘further prolongation of the [child's] unsettled familial status,’ ” especially given that the child has now been almost six years in petitioner's custody (Matter of Cyle F. [Alexander F.], 155 AD3d 1626, 1628 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 911 [2018]).
Entered: February 7, 2025
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 12
Decided: February 07, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)