Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JASON T. PILKENTON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. THEA SOPHIA P. SCIPIONE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. JEFFREY L. TURNER, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the Attorney for the Child (AFC) appeals from an order that, in relevant part, dismissed petitioner father's petition seeking modification of the parties’ custody arrangement. The AFC contends that Family Court erred in determining that the father failed to establish the requisite change in circumstances. The AFC further contends that it is in the child's best interests to award primary residency to the father. Assuming, arguendo, that the AFC has authority to pursue an appeal on behalf of the child under the circumstances of this case (see Matter of Muriel v Muriel, 228 AD3d 1345, 1346 [4th Dept 2024]; Matter of Kessler v Fancher, 112 AD3d 1323, 1324 [4th Dept 2013]), we reject the AFC's contentions. Assuming, arguendo, that the father demonstrated a change in circumstances sufficient to warrant an inquiry into the best interests of the child, we conclude that the record establishes that “the continuity and stability of the existing custodial arrangement is in the child[ ]’s best interests” (Matter of Wilson v Hayward, 128 AD3d 1475, 1477 [4th Dept 2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 909 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]).
Entered: February 7, 2025
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 910
Decided: February 07, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)