Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mitchell THOMPSON, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J., at plea; Laurie Peterson, J., at sentencing), rendered July 22, 2019, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a jail term of nine months, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant's waiver of indictment was valid. Although the plea minutes are silent as to when defendant executed the written waiver, the record as a whole demonstrates that defendant signed it “in open court in the presence of his attorney” (CPL 195.20; see People v. Mora, 227 A.D.3d 553, 209 N.Y.S.3d 422 [1st Dept. 2024], lv denied 42 N.Y.3d 929, 216 N.Y.S.3d 123, 240 N.E.3d 842 [2024]; People v. Ramos, 189 A.D.3d 586, 134 N.Y.S.3d 182 [1st Dept. 2020], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 1059, 141 N.Y.S.3d 746, 165 N.E.3d 672 [2021]; People v. Moore, 137 A.D.3d 704, 27 N.Y.S.3d 380 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 1136, 39 N.Y.S.3d 118, 61 N.E.3d 517 [2016]). The written waiver is dated the same day as the plea proceeding, and both defendant and defense counsel signed the document confirming that defendant signed it in open court in counsel's presence. The court also signed and approved the waiver, stating that it was “satisfied that the waiver complies with [CPL] 195.10 and 195.20” (see People v. Myers, 32 N.Y.3d 18, 21, 84 N.Y.S.3d 406, 109 N.E.3d 555 [2018]; People v. Mora, 227 A.D.3d at 553, 209 N.Y.S.3d 422). Thus, the record is sufficient to establish that defendant's waiver of indictment satisfied CPL 195.20.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3367
Decided: January 02, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)