Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jeffrey GOODSON, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. STEPH–LEIGH ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant–Respondent, Oli 99 Cent Fresh Pizza, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Naita A. Semaj, J.), entered September 21, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendant Steph–Leigh Associates, LLC for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Steph–Leigh Associates, LLC (defendant) established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, where plaintiff tripped and fell over a raised door saddle at the entrance of the premises owned by defendant, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Defendant showed that it was an out-of-possession landlord with no duty to maintain and repair the entrance under the lease agreement, which assigned such responsibility to the tenant and granted defendant only a limited right of re-entry to repair the premises contingent on the tenant's failure to do so (see Kittay v. Moskowitz, 95 A.D.3d 451, 452, 944 N.Y.S.2d 497 [1st Dept. 2012], lv denied 20 N.Y.3d 859, 2013 WL 518556 [2013]). Furthermore, the door saddle was not structural in nature (see Paniagua v. Bridge Food Ctr. Corp., 59 A.D.3d 356, 357, 874 N.Y.S.2d 433 [1st Dept. 2009]), and plaintiff failed to allege any violation of a specific statutory provision (see Joyner v. Mingles Cafe, Inc., 115 A.D.3d 560, 561, 982 N.Y.S.2d 118 [1st Dept. 2014]).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions, including that defendant had constructive notice of the raised door saddle, and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3250
Decided: December 17, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)