Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gary P. JENKINS, etc., Petitioner–Respondent, v. GINA B., a Person Alleged to be Incapacitated, Respondent–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered October 19, 2023, which denied respondent's motion to vacate an order and judgment, same court and Justice, entered September 23, 2022, adjudging her to be an incapacitated person and appointing a temporary guardian for her person and property for a period of three years, unanimously reversed, on the law, facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, the motion to vacate the order and judgment granted, and the matter remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this decision.
Under the unique facts of this case, we are exercising our inherent power to vacate the order and judgment in the interest of substantial justice (see Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 68, 760 N.Y.S.2d 727, 790 N.E.2d 1156 [2003]). Vacatur is warranted in the interest of justice because the court held a hearing pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.11 in respondent's absence and without having made a finding regarding her inability to meaningfully participate in the hearing (see Matter of Banks [Gwendolyn R.], 138 A.D.3d 519, 520, 28 N.Y.S.3d 321 [1st Dept. 2016]). In addition, the court failed to appoint counsel to represent respondent even though she was contesting the guardianship petition (see Matter of Wogelt, 223 A.D.2d 309, 314, 646 N.Y.S.2d 94 [1st Dept. 1996]).
Accordingly, we remand the matter for a new hearing in accordance with this decision, to be held expeditiously.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 3049
Decided: November 14, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)