Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angel MULERO, Defendant–Appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2018, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's assessment of 30 points under the risk factor for use of a dangerous instrument was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The grand jury testimony of one of the young victims (see People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 573, 883 N.Y.S.2d 154, 910 N.E.2d 983 [2009]), although vague, was sufficient to establish that defendant had threatened her with a sharp metal tool that was “readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury” during one of the instances of sexual assault (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 8 [2006], quoting Penal Law § 10.00[13]). The fact that defendant was not indicted for any weapons-related offenses is not dispositive, where there is no indication that any such count was presented to the grand jury.
The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were either adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime, in which defendant repeatedly raped his girlfriend's two young daughters over the course of several years.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2678
Decided: October 03, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)