Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clemetin ALLEN, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gilbert C. Hong, J.), rendered November 22, 2019, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.
The People presented clear and convincing evidence of an independent basis for an in-court identification of defendant by the witness, a store manager who greeted defendant before he took a tote bag from the store (People v. Rivera, 132 A.D.3d 530, 18 N.Y.S.3d 36 [1st Dept. 2015], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 1074, 38 N.Y.S.3d 845, 60 N.E.3d 1211 [2016]). The witness's hearing testimony established that she was standing about 15 feet away from defendant when she greeted him in the entrance of the well-lit store, had an unobstructed view of defendant for two or three seconds, and remembered defendant's green sweater and the strong smell of popcorn he was carrying (see People v. Williams, 222 A.D.2d 149, 153, 646 N.Y.S.2d 665 [1st Dept. 1996], lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 1072, 651 N.Y.S.2d 416, 674 N.E.2d 346 [1996]; Matter of Jason V., 171 A.D.2d 447, 567 N.Y.S.2d 30 [1st Dept. 1991]). Additionally, the witness identified defendant in a photo array, which, though not admitted at trial, was not unduly suggestive (see People v. Hutter, 143 A.D.3d 574, 574–575, 41 N.Y.S.3d 211 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 1125, 51 N.Y.S.3d 21, 73 N.E.3d 361 [2016]; see also People v. Rosales, 216 A.D.2d 162, 163, 628 N.Y.S.2d 656 [1st Dept. 1995], lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 846, 634 N.Y.S.2d 455, 658 N.E.2d 233 [1995]). In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E.2d 787 [1975]).
Defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim is unreviewable on direct appeal because it involves matters not reflected in or fully explained by the record, which may not be addressed on appeal in the absence of a CPL 440.10 motion (see People v. Maffei, 35 N.Y.3d 264, 269–270, 127 N.Y.S.3d 403, 150 N.E.3d 1169 [2020]). To the extent the existing record permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713–714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 [1998]; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 [1984]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2632
Decided: September 26, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)