Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]) and robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [4]), defendant contends that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. As the People correctly concede, defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal because “[t]he written waiver of the right to appeal signed by defendant [at the time of the plea] and the verbal waiver colloquy conducted by [County Court] together improperly characterized the waiver as ‘an absolute bar to the taking of a direct appeal and the loss of attendant rights to counsel and poor person relief,’ as well as to ‘all postconviction relief separate from the direct appeal’ ” (People v. McMillian, 185 A.D.3d 1420, 1421, 127 N.Y.S.3d 669 [4th Dept. 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1096, 131 N.Y.S.3d 306, 155 N.E.3d 799 [2020], quoting People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 565, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020]; see People v. Thornton, 213 A.D.3d 1332, 1332, 183 N.Y.S.3d 237 [4th Dept. 2023], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 1157, 190 N.Y.S.3d 713, 211 N.E.3d 1166 [2023]). Nevertheless, we perceive no basis in the record to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). We note, however, that the certificate of disposition must be amended to correct a clerical error (see People v. Brown, 221 A.D.3d 1565, 1566, 200 N.Y.S.3d 629 [4th Dept. 2023]; People v. Thurston, 208 A.D.3d 1629, 1630, 174 N.Y.S.3d 663 [4th Dept. 2023]). The certificate of disposition erroneously states that defendant was sentenced to a determinate term of 25 years’ imprisonment on count 4, robbery in the first degree, and should be amended to correctly reflect that defendant was sentenced to a determinate term of five years’ imprisonment on that count.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 625
Decided: September 27, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)