Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, PETITIONER, v. ROBERT M. WEICHERT, SUSAN WEICHERT, RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs, the petition is granted, and respondents Robert M. Weichert and Susan Weichert are directed to pay respondent CNY Fair Housing, Inc. the sum of $8,000 for punitive damages, with interest at a rate of 9% per annum, commencing October 7, 2015; and to pay the Comptroller of the State of New York the sum of $8,000 for a civil fine and penalty, with interest at the rate of 9% per annum, commencing October 7, 2015.
Memorandum: Petitioner, State Division of Human Rights (SDHR), commenced this proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 seeking to enforce the final order of its Commissioner, which in turn adopted the “recommended findings of fact, opinion and decision, and order” of an administrative law judge (ALJ). The ALJ concluded, following a public hearing, that Robert M. Weichert and Susan Weichert (respondents) had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices with respect to housing. The ALJ awarded respondent CNY Fair Housing, Inc. (Fair Housing) punitive damages of $8,000 and imposed a civil fine and penalty of $8,000.
We agree with SDHR that the Commissioner's determination that respondents discriminated against Fair Housing based on disability is supported by substantial evidence (see Executive Law § 296 [5] [a] [1]; Matter of Sherwood Terrace Apts. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 61 AD3d 1333, 1334 [4th Dept 2009]). We further agree with SDHR that the award of $8,000 in punitive damages to Fair Housing is both appropriate “as a deterrent against housing discrimination” and “is supported by the evidence” herein (Matter of Woehrling v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 56 AD3d 1304, 1305 [4th Dept 2008]; see § 297 [4] [c] [iv]; Sherwood Terrace Apts., 61 AD3d at 1334), and that the $8,000 civil fine and penalty was properly imposed based on the Commissioner's determination that respondents “committed an unlawful discriminatory act” (§ 297 [4] [c] [vi]; see Matter of Li v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 147 AD3d 1321, 1321-1322 [4th Dept 2017]).
We have reviewed respondents’ contentions and conclude that they are without merit.
Entered: July 26, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 434
Decided: July 26, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)