Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Yubeiker MURILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from judgment of conviction (Stephen Antignani, J.), rendered August 17, 2016, held in abeyance, and the matter remitted to Criminal Court for a Wade/Rodriguez hearing regarding the victim's identification testimony.
A hearing is necessary to determine whether the victim's identification of defendant was confirmatory in nature (see People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445 [1992]) and, if not, whether the identification procedure was unduly suggestive (see People v Dixon, 85 NY2d 218 [1995]). Given the procedural circumstances, the parties did not have a full opportunity to litigate this issue. Accordingly, we hold the appeal in abeyance and remit for a hearing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
All concur
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570633 /16
Decided: May 30, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)