Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GEORGE W. GOWEN etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. HELLY NAHMAD GALLERY, INC., et al., Defendants–Appellants.
Aaron Richard Golub, Esquire, P.C., New York (Nehemiah S. Glanc of counsel), for appellants.
Landrigan & Aurnou, LLP, White Plains (Phillip C. Landrigan of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joel M. Cohen, J.), entered on or about June 16, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants' motion for an award of sanctions against plaintiff's counsel, Landrigan & Aumou, LLP (LAL) and nonparty Philippe Maestracci, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The court's denial of defendants' sanctions motion was not a “clear abuse of discretion” (Grozea v. Lagoutova, 67 AD3d 611, 611 [1st Dept 2009] ). LAL attested that its representations to the discovery Referee, Supreme Court, and this Court that Maestracci, nonparty grandson of Oscar Stettiner, was too ill to travel from France to New York for a deposition were made without knowledge of Maestracci's personal travel to Vietnam, or the apparent improvement in Maestracci's health. Moreover, in affirming the Referee's order directing the deposition to take place in France, this Court did not emphasize Maestracci's health status, but rather the “limited nature of his knowledge, that he had not been born when the painting at issue was confiscated and that he was a toddler at the time of Stettiner's death” (Gowen v. Helly Nahmad Gallery, Inc., 169 AD3d 580, 581 [1st Dept 2019] ). Although LAL should have conferred with Maestracci for updated health information before making representations to the court, the statements were not “so egregious as to constitute frivolous conduct within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130–1.1” (Nugent v. City of New York, 189 AD3d 631, 632 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see also Fishoff Family Found. v Frydman, 148 AD3d 601, 601 [1st Dept 2017] ).
We have considered defendants' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
M - 2021–00174 Gowen v. Helly Nahmad Gallery, et al .
Motion to strike plaintiff's brief; to declare that Maestracci is a party and/or a co-plaintiff and is in default on this appeal; to bar Maestracci from submitting a respondent's brief; to deem Maestracci to have defaulted on defendants' sanctions motion; and to further sanction plaintiff and his counsel, denied.
M–2021–003812 Gowen v Helly Nahmad Gallery, et al .
Cross-motion to supplement the record and for sanctions, denied.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: Index No. 650646 /14
Decided: April 30, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)