Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: 58E83 REALTY, LLC Petitioner–Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL et al., Respondents–Respondents.
Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Lyle E. Frank, J.), entered December 8, 2023, denying the petition to annul a determination of respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), dated March 24, 2023, which affirmed the denial of petitioner's applications to decline to renew the leases of two tenants and to commence eviction proceedings against those tenants so that petitioner could demolish the building, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
DHCR's determination was not in violation of law, nor was it arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Peckham v. Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, 431 [2009]). DHCR's Operational Bulletin 2009–1, issued under Rent Stabilization Law § 26–511(c)(9)(a) and Rent Stabilization Code § 2524.5(a)(2)(i), provides that “[e]vidence of financial ability to complete the [demolition] project may include a Letter of Intent or a Commitment Letter from a financial institution, or such other evidence as DHCR may deem appropriate under the circumstances.” In this case, petitioner did not submit a letter of intent or commitment from a financial institution, and under the particular circumstances herein, DHCR had a rational basis for finding that the evidence petitioner did submit, including affidavits and a brokerage account statement, was insufficient to establish its financial ability to complete the demolition project (see Matter of 118 Duane LLC v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 212 AD3d 401, 402 [1st Dept 2023]).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2116
Decided: April 23, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)