Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Nina SAXON et al., Petitioners–Appellants, v. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF the NEW YORK DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE et al., Respondents–Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. Nervo, J.), entered on or about November 28, 2023, which denied and dismissed petitioners' petition for an order recognizing them as duly elected District Leaders of the Democratic Party County Committee Divisional Committee for the 68th Assembly District Part A, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly granted respondents' CPLR 3211(a)(5) motion to dismiss the petition filed on November 7, 2023, as untimely commenced under Election Law § 16–102(2) (see Flintlock Constr. Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, LLP, 188 AD3d 530, 531 [1st Dept 2020]; MTGLQ Invs., LP v. Wozencraft, 172 AD3d 644, 644–645 [1st Dept 2019], lv dismissed 34 NY3d 1010 [2019]). The court correctly found that respondents met their initial burden of establishing, prima facie, that the grievance that respondents declined to seat petitioners as District Leaders accrued as of a September 12, 2023 meeting of the Executive Committee of the New York Democratic Committee. Even if the accrual date for a grievance concerning a petitioner's rejected seating as a committee member may, in exceptional circumstances, be subject to an equitable toll, despite that the Court of Appeals has “consistently mandated strict compliance with time limitations imposed by the Election Law, notwithstanding a candidate's unique or extenuating circumstances” (Matter of Seawright v Board of Elections in the City of N.Y., 35 NY3d 227, 233 [2020]), such exceptional circumstances are not presented on the record here.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1910
Decided: March 26, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)