Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reggie Moody, Defendant-Appellant.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Robert Rosenthal, J.), rendered March 13, 2020, affirmed.
The information charging attempted tampering with physical evidence (see Penal Law §§ 110, 215.40[2]) was not jurisdictionally defective. Nonhearsay allegations established every element of the offense and defendant's commission thereof (see CPL 100.40[1][c]; People v Middleton, 35 NY3d 952, 954 [2020]). The arresting officer alleged that he observed defendant holding a package containing what the officer believed to be crack cocaine in his right hand; that when he approached defendant and identified himself as a police officer, defendant placed his right hand into his pants pocket; that when the officer attempted to take defendant's hand out of his pocket to place him under arrest, defendant put his right hand up to his mouth; and that as a result of defendant's conduct, the officer was unable to recover the package from defendant. Contrary to defendant's present contention, these allegations "support[ ] the inference that when [defendant] put an unknown object into his mouth, he was aware that he was about to be arrested, and supports the additional inference that the object was contraband or evidence that defendant intended to prevent the police from discovering" (People v Green, 54 AD3d 603, 603-604 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 897 [2008]), even though the police were unable to recover the item (see People v Wilkins, 111 AD3d 451 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1044 [2014]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: January 16, 2024
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570196 /21
Decided: January 16, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)