Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
R. Michael LLOYD, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Sandra Lloyd and Others, Deceased, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. NATIONAL PROPANE CORPORATION, Formerly Known as Conservative Gas Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Paraco Gas of Long Island, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered December 18, 1998, which denied defendant's motion for a change of venue from New York County to Suffolk County pursuant to CPLR 510(3), unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion granted.
Plaintiff brought this wrongful death action as administrator of the estates of his deceased wife and children, who died in their home in Greenlawn, Suffolk County, from a gas leak which led to an explosion and fire. Plaintiff commenced the action in New York County, asserting that National Propane Corporation (NPC) and Paraco Gas had their principal places of business in that county. This appeal arises from the court's denial of NPC's motion to change venue to Suffolk County. We reverse.
The motion court improvidently exercised its discretion when it denied defendant's motion. The balance of factors weighs heavily in favor of placing venue in Suffolk County (Tricarico v. Cerasuolo, 199 A.D.2d 142, 605 N.Y.S.2d 84). The fire occurred in Suffolk County, all of the liability witnesses either work or live in Suffolk County, several witnesses have expressed inconvenience in having to testify in New York County, and the only verified basis for plaintiff's choice of venue in New York County is NPC's designation of its agent there for service of process (Neos v. Crabby Joe's, Inc., 241 A.D.2d 337, 659 N.Y.S.2d 31; Cruz v. Kodis, 241 A.D.2d 338, 659 N.Y.S.2d 287; Risoli v. Long Is. Light. Co., 138 A.D.2d 316, 526 N.Y.S.2d 449; Turano v. Consumer's Carpet Workroom Co., 112 A.D.2d 365, 491 N.Y.S.2d 817; Seabrook v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 58 A.D.2d 538, 395 N.Y.S.2d 208).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 04, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)