Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DENISE M. THURSTON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. PAT J. BOMBARD, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs and respondent is granted leave to move to reinstate the appeal upon the posting of an undertaking with Family Court, Onondaga County, in the amount of $90,000 within 60 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry.
Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, respondent father appeals from an order committing him to jail for three months for willfully failing to obey a child support order. The father moved to Florida without ever serving his term of imprisonment or purging the contempt finding by paying the amount set by the court toward his child support arrears. The father is now the subject of a bench warrant in this State, but has refused to return.
Contrary to the father's contention, the fugitive disentitlement theory applies to this appeal (see Matter of Shehatou v Louka, 118 AD3d 1357, 1358 [4th Dept 2014]; Matter of Skiff-Murray v Murray, 305 AD2d 751, 752-753 [3d Dept 2003]). By the father's “absence, [he] is evading the very order[ ] from which [he] seeks appellate relief and has willfully made [himself] unavailable to obey the mandate of [Family Court] in the event of an affirmance” (Shehatou, 118 AD3d at 1358 [internal quotation marks omitted]). We therefore dismiss the appeal and grant leave to the father to move to reinstate it on the condition that, within 60 days of the service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, he posts an undertaking with the court in the amount of $90,000.00, i.e., the amount set by the court to allow the father to purge the term of incarceration (see id.). In light of our determination, we decline to reach the father's remaining contentions.
Entered: December 22, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 940
Decided: December 22, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)