Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos CRUZ, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.), rendered November 13, 2018, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 31/212 years, unanimously modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the conviction to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and reducing the sentence to time served, and otherwise affirmed.
Although defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was valid, defendant's claim that the court improperly imposed an enhanced sentence based on postplea conduct survives his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Turner, 158 A.D.3d 892, 893, 70 N.Y.S.3d 610 [3d Dept. 2018]; People v. Lodge, 54 A.D.3d 875, 876, 863 N.Y.S.2d 816 [2d Dept. 2008]; People v. Baxter, 302 A.D.2d 950, 951, 757 N.Y.S.2d 915 [4th Dept. 2003], lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 652, 760 N.Y.S.2d 116, 790 N.E.2d 290 [2003]).
“It is implicit to a promise of drug treatment as an alternative to imprisonment that the defendant will have access to a facility suited to provide him or her with a reasonable opportunity to deal with the addiction and to satisfactorily complete a program designed to that end” (People v. Rodriguez, 289 A.D.2d 512, 513, 735 N.Y.S.2d 168 [2d Dept. 2001]). Thus, where a defendant has promised to complete a drug treatment program as an alternative to prison, the defendant is entitled to be placed in a suitable program or be provided an opportunity to withdraw the plea (see People v. Feliciano, 14 A.D.3d 308, 309–310, 787 N.Y.S.2d 281 [1st Dept. 2005]; People v. Jiminez, 307 A.D.2d 880, 881, 763 N.Y.S.2d 751 [1st Dept. 2003]). Here, defendant was afforded neither before sentencing. Under the circumstances, and because defendant has already completed his sentence, defendant is entitled to the benefit of the original promise of a class A misdemeanor and to a sentence of time served.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 1001
Decided: November 14, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)