UPFRONT MEGATAINMENT INC v. PLLC (2023)

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered July 18, 2022, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate nonparty Manson Johnson Conner PLLC's charging lien, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion denied, the lien reinstated, and the matter remanded for an evidentiary hearing on whether the Manson firm was terminated for cause.

In light of this Court's decision regarding plaintiffs’ co-counsel, Napoli Shkolnik PLLC, on the same facts, we determine that the Manson firm established prima facie entitlement to a charging lien under Judiciary Law § 475 (see Upfront Megatainment, Inc. v Thiam, 217 AD3d 595 [1st Dept 2023]).  Although the Manson firm did not represent plaintiffs in the instant action, “no party disputes that it was retained to negotiate the settlement agreement on which the action is based, and that its retainer agreement with plaintiffs entitled it to payments ‘for any amounts recovered’ under the settlement agreement” (id. at 596).

As to plaintiffs’ claim that the Manson firm was terminated for cause, based on the reasons stated in our decision in Napoli Shkolnik's appeal (id.), we remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue.

M–2023–03759 – Upfront Megatainment, Inc., et al. v Thiam

Motion to strike reply brief, denied.