Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chase LEGGETT, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Neil E. Ross, J.), rendered May 25, 2022, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 3 years, followed by 11/212 years of postrelease supervision, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing, and otherwise affirmed.
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, and we reject his challenges to the validity of the waiver (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 559, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 [2019], cert denied 589 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 2634, 206 L.Ed.2d 512 [2020]). This waiver “forecloses appellate review of a sentencing court's discretionary decision to deny youthful offender status” (see People v. Derryan J., 157 A.D.3d 540, 540, 69 N.Y.S.3d 290 [1st Dept. 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1012, 78 N.Y.S.3d 282, 102 N.E.3d 1063 [2018]).
Defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal also forecloses review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v. Gonzalez, 178 A.D.3d 440, 111 N.Y.S.3d 171 [1st Dept. 2019], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 941, 124 N.Y.S.3d 292, 147 N.E.3d 562 [2020]). In any event, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Based on our own interest of justice powers, and with the People's consent, we vacate the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing (see People v. Chirinos, 190 A.D.3d 434, 135 N.Y.S.3d 641 [1st Dept. 2021]).
We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 644
Decided: September 28, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)