Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mario MONI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered June 26, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 1/212 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly declined to provide a circumstantial evidence charge with respect to the possession count, since there was both direct and circumstantial evidence of defendant's guilt. This was a constructive possession case in which the evidence did not warrant an additional instruction on circumstantial evidence (see People v. Daddona, 81 N.Y.2d 990, 992, 599 N.Y.S.2d 530, 615 N.E.2d 1014 [1993]; People v. Perez, 259 A.D.2d 274, 687 N.Y.S.2d 84 [1999], lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 976, 695 N.Y.S.2d 62, 716 N.E.2d 1107 [1999] ). There was direct evidence of defendant's constructive possession of the contraband itself (compare People v. Brian, 84 N.Y.2d 887, 889, 620 N.Y.S.2d 789, 644 N.E.2d 1345 [1994] ), including testimony that the police observed defendant entering and leaving the back room at his place of employment and then engaging in a hand-to-hand transaction with a person who was subsequently apprehended and found in possession of narcotics in identical packaging to those the police found in the back room of the store.
Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 21, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)