Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matter of Gino LaRUSSO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Madonna SPENCER, Respondent-Respondent.
Family Court properly denied the objections of petitioner to the Hearing Examiner's order dismissing his petition seeking a downward modification of his child support obligation. Petitioner failed to meet his burden of establishing that an unanticipated or unreasonable change of circumstances has occurred to warrant a downward modification (see Matter of De Luca v. Randall, 285 A.D.2d 684, 686, 726 N.Y.S.2d 797). “A party who causes [his] own inability to pay support is not entitled to a downward modification of support payments” (Matter of Fries v. Price-Yablin, 209 A.D.2d 1002, 1003, 619 N.Y.S.2d 900).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 30, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)