Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., Plaintiff, v. David RANKIN, et al., Defendants.
David Rankin, et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Success Club International, et al., Third-Party Defendants, Feathered Nest, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered July 10, 2001, which, inter alia, granted third-party plaintiffs' motion to stay arbitration and denied the cross motion of third-party defendants Feathered Nest, Inc. and David Hench to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Contrary to the contentions of Feathered Nest and Hench, this matter is not governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and Federal law, since it does not involve a transaction in interstate commerce (see Federal Arbitration Act, 9 USC § 2).
Under New York law, the right to compel arbitration does not extend to a party that has not signed the agreement pursuant to which arbitration is sought unless the right of the nonsignatory is expressly provided for in the agreement (see Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 N.Y.2d 181, 185, 473 N.Y.S.2d 136, 461 N.E.2d 273; Matter of H.I.G. Capital Mgt., Inc. v. Ligator, 233 A.D.2d 270, 650 N.Y.S.2d 124). While the hold harmless clause in the sublease containing the arbitration clause here at issue did benefit Feathered Nest, nothing in the arbitration clause itself suggests that the sublease signatories intended to confer upon Feathered Nest the right to compel arbitration of disputes arising under the sublease (see County of Onondaga v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 192 A.D.2d 1108, 596 N.Y.S.2d 223).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 22, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)