Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Maggie LaROCHE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Leibovitz, J.), rendered March 16, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of arson in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 12 years and 2 1/313 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given the background and character of the People's main witness and any inconsistencies in her testimony, were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations. The credible evidence established that minutes after defendant threatened to set a fire, a fire broke out, and that immediately thereafter defendant was seen at the location specifically determined by the fire marshal to have been the fire's point of origin. Accordingly, the only reasonable conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence is that defendant set the fire.
The record establishes that defendant received meaningful representation (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584).
We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.
Defendant's remaining contentions, including those contained in her pro se supplemental briefs, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 31, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)