Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Roger MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Deborah Hari DONIGER, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered on or about November 22, 2005, which, inter alia, directed defendants to turn over to the Sheriff of New York County certain out-of-State accounts, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendant William Doniger, plaintiffs' judgment debtor (see Miller v. Epstein, 293 A.D.2d 282, 742 N.Y.S.2d 191 [2002] ), was properly directed to turn over his out-of-State Wachovia account to the Sheriff of New York County (CPLR 5225[a]; see Starbare II Partners v. Sloan, 216 A.D.2d 238, 629 N.Y.S.2d 23 [1995] ). The court also properly directed that certain specified out-of-State accounts transferred by William Doniger to his family members, named defendants herein who hold the accounts either in trust or individually, be turned over to the Sheriff, the evidence showing that plaintiffs have a superior right to at least a portion of the assets in these accounts (CPLR 5225 [b]; see Garland D. Cox Assoc. v. Koffman, 48 N.Y.2d 878, 424 N.Y.S.2d 360, 400 N.E.2d 302 [1979]; Siemens & Halske GmbH. v. Gres, 32 A.D.2d 624, 299 N.Y.S.2d 908 [1969] ). Such superior rights are derived from William Doniger's presumptive fraudulent transfer of nearly all his assets beginning in or about 1994, when plaintiffs commenced their first action for fraud against him (Debtor and Creditor Law 273, 273-a, 276; see Matter of Kalati v. Independent Diamond Brokers, 209 A.D.2d 412, 618 N.Y.S.2d 421 [1994] ). We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: April 27, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)