Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: WILLIAM P., Respondent-Appellant. Erie County Attorney, Petitioner-Respondent.
Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him to be a juvenile delinquent based on the finding that he committed the crime of unlawful possession of weapons by persons under 16 (Penal Law § 265.05). That statute expressly provides that “[a] person who violates the provisions of [section 265.05] shall be adjudged a juvenile delinquent.” Respondent contends that Family Court erred in refusing to suppress the gun without conducting a hearing because he was illegally searched by the school principal. We reject that contention. A suppression hearing was unnecessary inasmuch as respondent's “allegations on their face ‘did not lay out a factual scenario which, if credited, would have warranted suppression’ ” (Matter of Elvin G., 47 A.D.3d 527, 527, 851 N.Y.S.2d 129, quoting People v. Coleman, 82 N.Y.2d 415, 432, 604 N.Y.S.2d 922, 624 N.E.2d 1017). According to respondent, the principal confronted him based on information from another student that respondent was in possession of a gun in his book bag. “Under ordinary circumstances, a search of a student by a ․ school official will be ‘justified at its inception’ when there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is violating ․ the law” (New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 341-342, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720) and, here, respondent “did not present a legal basis upon which to challenge the [principal's] conduct” (Elvin G., 47 A.D.3d at 527-528, 851 N.Y.S.2d 129).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 31, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)