Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Gamalier SILVA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents-Respondents.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered March 12, 1997, which denied petitioner's application to serve a late notice of claim upon respondents nunc pro tunc, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the application granted.
This is an application pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e(5). On December 28, 1995, petitioner allegedly slipped and fell on a metal plate set in a cracked and broken portion of a Bronx sidewalk. Two weeks later, after experiencing severe pain, he was transported to Lincoln Hospital where he was diagnosed with fractures of his lower back. After a 20-day hospitalization, petitioner undertook a course of physical therapy, and retained counsel only on April 1, 1996, five days after expiration of the statutory 90-day period for filing notice of claim (§ 50-e[1][a] ). Respondents received the required statutory notices on April 5th and 8th, respectively nine and twelve days after the deadline.
In view of the medical and other evidence submitted, we find that petitioner's disabling injury provides a reasonable excuse for the short delay in filing (see, Matter of Annis v. New York City Tr. Auth., 108 A.D.2d 643, 485 N.Y.S.2d 529). Furthermore, any prejudice to respondents was minimal, since the alleged defect was not transitory or likely to dissipate over the period of delay (cf., Matter of Green v. New York City Hous. Auth., 180 A.D.2d 586, 580 N.Y.S.2d 743).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 27, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)