Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Maurice McCOLLOUGH, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), rendered August 27, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 25 years, 15 years and 2 1/313 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's request for a missing witness charge, since, as the People demonstrated, the witness's testimony would have been cumulative to the consistent testimony of the People's five eyewitnesses (see People v. Macana, 84 N.Y.2d 173, 180, 615 N.Y.S.2d 656, 639 N.E.2d 13 [1994] ). The court also properly precluded defendant from commenting in summation on the People's failure to call this witness, since defendant did not show that he had a good faith basis for such comments, a showing required by People v. Tankleff, 84 N.Y.2d 992, 994-995, 622 N.Y.S.2d 503, 646 N.E.2d 805 [1994]. In any event, were we to find any error with regard to either of these rulings, we would find it to be harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt. To the extent that defendant is raising a constitutional claim, such claim is unpreserved (see People v. Angelo, 88 N.Y.2d 217, 222, 644 N.Y.S.2d 460, 666 N.E.2d 1333 [1996] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review such claim, we would reject it.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 10, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)