Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Celeste THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered June 23, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly caused by a sidewalk defect, denied plaintiff's motion to set aside the jury's verdict finding that defendant City's negligence in maintaining the sidewalk was not a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injury, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A water-filled depression of the size depicted in the photographs, and the existence of a safe alternative route around the depression along the curb, fairly support a finding that plaintiff's attempt at a one-legged vault over the depression was so unsafe and unreasonable as to constitute the sole cause of her accident (cf. Schermerhorn v. Warfield, 213 A.D.2d 877, 623 N.Y.S.2d 422 [1995] ). Although plaintiff testified that a pile of garbage on one side of the depression and traffic in the street on the other side left her with no choice but to attempt to jump or stride over the depression, the jury apparently was not persuaded, and the evidence of a dangerous flow of traffic near the curb did not so preponderate in plaintiff's favor that a finding of a safe alternative route could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744, 746, 631 N.Y.S.2d 122, 655 N.E.2d 163 [1995]; Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134, 495 N.Y.S.2d 184 [1985] ). We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: March 15, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)