Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Connie LEUNG, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), entered May 7, 2003, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of two counts of murder in the second degree, and sentencing her to consecutive terms of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Defendant's confession was not the product of an unlawful detention. The record supports the hearing court's finding that defendant voluntarily accompanied detectives to the police station and that she was not in custody at the time she made the confession (see People v. Morales, 42 N.Y.2d 129, 137-138, 397 N.Y.S.2d 587, 366 N.E.2d 248 [1977], cert. denied 434 U.S. 1018, 98 S.Ct. 739, 54 L.Ed.2d 765 [1978] ). The detectives who confronted defendant did not make any remarks that, viewed in their proper context, constituted an unlawful seizure. Given the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable innocent person in defendant's position would not have thought she had been seized by the police (see People v. Centano, 76 N.Y.2d 837, 560 N.Y.S.2d 121, 559 N.E.2d 1280 [1990]; People v. Yukl, 25 N.Y.2d 585, 590-592, 307 N.Y.S.2d 857, 256 N.E.2d 172 [1969], cert. denied 400 U.S. 851, 91 S.Ct. 78, 27 L.Ed.2d 89 [1970] ). We note in particular that there was evidence of defendant's understanding that she was not being arrested and that she would be returning to her hotel room after speaking with the detectives.
The court properly denied defendant's plea withdrawal motion. The plea minutes establish the voluntariness of the plea, and there is nothing in the record, including the presentence report, that casts any doubt on defendant's mental competence (see People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 743 N.Y.S.2d 45, 769 N.E.2d 802 [2002] ). Similarly, the court was under no obligation to order a CPL article 730 examination sua sponte (see People v. Tortorici, 92 N.Y.2d 757, 686 N.Y.S.2d 346, 709 N.E.2d 87 [1999], cert. denied 528 U.S. 834, 120 S.Ct. 94, 145 L.Ed.2d 80 [1999] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 17, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)