Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Guisseppe ROVITO, Respondent, v. Juanita MELENDEZ, Appellant.
Final judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this nonpayment proceeding, commenced in March 1995, tenant counterclaimed for rent overcharges based in part on a jump in rent from $306.50 on the 1987 annual apartment registration to $425 on the 1988 registration. On a motion for partial summary judgment, the Housing Court barred the introduction of proof of the 1987/1988 jump pursuant to this court's decision in Avner v. Trump Mgt. Inc. (N.Y.L.J., May 19, 1995, at 34, col. 5). In Avner, this court interpreted the relevant provisions of the Rent Stabilization Law (Administrative Code of City of N.Y., tit. 26, ch. 4) then in effect as precluding the introduction of proof of overcharges occurring more than four years prior to the commencement of the action. Tenant now urges this court to reconsider Avner, noting that both trial and appellate courts in the First Department have reached a contrary conclusion (see, e.g., Hart-Zafra v. Pilkes, N.Y.L.J., Feb. 1, 1995, at 29, col. 2 [Civ. Ct., N.Y. Co.], aff'd. sub nom. Zafra v. Pilkes, N.Y.L.J., April 12, 1996, at 23, col. 3 [App. Term, 1st Dept.], aff'd App.Div., 1st Dept., July 24, 1997).
While ordinarily this court would be bound by the Appellate Division, First Department's interpretation of the Code (see, Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. Storms, 102 A.D.2d 663, 476 N.Y.S.2d 918), we are here relieved of this constraint by virtue of the Legislature's adoption on June 19, 1997 of the Rent Regulation Reform Act of 1997 (L.1997, ch. 116). This Act, the relevant provisions of which are made applicable to pending actions and proceedings (L.1997, ch. 116, § 46[1] ), amended the Code to provide that “examination of the rental history of the housing accommodation prior to the four-year period preceding the filing of a complaint ․” is precluded (Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 [Administrative Code] § 26-516[a][ii][2][ii], as amended). In light of the new Act, it is clear that proof of the 1987/1988 jump in rent was not admissible.
MEMORANDUM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 03, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)