Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Willem J. REMMELINK (admitted as William Johannes Remmelink), an attorney and counselor-at-law: Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Willem J. Remmelink, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on August 28, 1989.
On February 6, 1997, he pleaded guilty to certain felony charges, as follows: one count of grand larceny in the first degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.42, one count of grand larceny in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.40(1), and one count of grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.35. The respondent was sentenced to, respectively, concurrent terms of 28 months to seven years, one to three years, and one to three years, on April 18, 1997.
By petition dated July 21, 1997, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee is seeking an order striking respondent's name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b). As the petitioner has been convicted of crimes which are felonies within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90(4)(e), he automatically ceased to be an attorney by operation of law upon entry of his guilty plea (Matter of Scott, 222 A.D.2d 67, 68, 643 N.Y.S.2d 346; Matter of Marchisello, 218 A.D.2d 214, 638 N.Y.S.2d 293).
Accordingly, the Committee's petition is granted and respondent's name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b).
Petition granted and Respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective September 18, 1997.
All concur.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 18, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)