Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert R. SANTANA (admitted as Robert Rafael Santana), an attorney and counselor-at-law. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner, Robert R. Santana, Esq., Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to the New York Bar at the Second Judicial Department in 1992, and has maintained an office for such practice within the First Department at all relevant times since then. In 1995 he was found guilty, after jury trial, of harassment in the second degree (a violation), and two counts of falsely reporting an incident in the third degree (a class B misdemeanor), and was sentenced to a one-year period of conditional discharge, 43 days of intermittent imprisonment, and a fine of $90. Respondent failed to report this conviction to the Appellate Division, as required by Judiciary Law § 90(4)(c).
On June 19, 1996, this Court determined that respondent had been convicted of a “serious crime” (Judiciary Law § 90[4][d] ), and ordered him to show cause why final disciplinary action should not be taken. Respondent was not suspended in the interim.
The hearing panel determined that respondent had engaged in a campaign to harass his neighbor, who had charged that her child had been sodomized by a member of respondent's family. On two occasions, respondent, a former policeman, reported to the police that shots had been fired from the neighbor's apartment. Taking mitigating factors into consideration, the panel recommended no more than a one-year suspension from practice.
The findings and conclusions of the hearing panel should be confirmed. An unconditional, one-year suspension from practice is the appropriate sanction (cf., Matter of Muller, 231 A.D.2d 296, 659 N.Y.S.2d 255), in light of the gravity of respondent's misconduct, and his failure to report his conviction to this Court. We also note respondent's lack of remorse, and his failure to respond to the instant motion.
Accordingly, the motion to confirm the panel's findings and conclusions is granted. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, and until reinstatement upon petition in accordance with Rules of this Court (22 NYCRR) § 603.14.
Motion to confirm the Hearing Panel's report granted, and respondent suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York for a period of one year, effective October 30, 1997, and until the further order of this Court.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: September 30, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)