Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Derron STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J. at suppression hearing; Bruce Allen, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered August 4, 2005, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 1/212 to 9 years, and order, same court (Bruce Allen, J.), entered on or about October 17, 2005, which denied defendant's CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380 [1977] ). In a drug-prone area, an experienced officer saw defendant engage in three furtive transactions involving the passing of small objects. In addition, two identified men involved in these transactions told the police that defendant was selling drugs and that they were his customers. Furthermore, defendant took evasive action as the police approached. This combination of factors provided probable cause for defendant's arrest (see People v. Jones, 90 N.Y.2d 835, 660 N.Y.S.2d 549, 683 N.E.2d 14 [1997]; People v. Schlaich, 218 A.D.2d 398, 640 N.Y.S.2d 885 [1996], lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 994, 649 N.Y.S.2d 401, 672 N.E.2d 627 [1996] ).
The court properly determined that defendant's CPL 440.10 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel did not warrant a hearing (see People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 799-800, 497 N.Y.S.2d 903, 488 N.E.2d 834 [1985] ).
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 28, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)