Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Steven WACHT, Defendant–Appellant.
We reject the contention of defendant that his statement should have been suppressed. The record supports the suppression court's determination that defendant was not in custody during the polygraph examination or during the post-examination interview (see, People v. Macri, 244 A.D.2d 970, 665 N.Y.S.2d 158, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 876, 668 N.Y.S.2d 574, 691 N.E.2d 646; People v. Hofmann, 238 A.D.2d 716, 719, 656 N.Y.S.2d 481, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 940, 664 N.Y.S.2d 758, 687 N.E.2d 655; cf., People v. Flint, 151 A.D.2d 964, 965, 542 N.Y.S.2d 63, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 739, 545 N.Y.S.2d 114, 543 N.E.2d 757). Defendant did not make an unequivocal request for an attorney when he questioned whether an attorney could be appointed for him during the polygraph examination (see, e.g., People v. Fridman, 71 N.Y.2d 845, 846, 527 N.Y.S.2d 737, 522 N.E.2d 1035; People v. Hicks, 69 N.Y.2d 969, 970, 516 N.Y.S.2d 648, 509 N.E.2d 343, rearg. denied 70 N.Y.2d 796, 522 N.Y.S.2d 113, 516 N.E.2d 1226; People v. Dehmler, 188 A.D.2d 1056, 1057, 591 N.Y.S.2d 918, lv. denied 81 N.Y.2d 1013, 600 N.Y.S.2d 201, 616 N.E.2d 858). In any event, defendant was advised that, if he asked for an attorney, all questioning would cease, and defendant decided instead to continue with the examination. We further reject defendant's contention that County Court erred in failing to determine whether the victim, who was eight years old at the time of trial, was competent to give sworn testimony (see, CPL 60.20[2] ). The victim did not testify under oath, and her responses to questioning demonstrated that she possessed sufficient intelligence and capacity to justify the admission of her unsworn testimony (see, CPL 60.20[2] ).
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 07, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)