Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James COLOSI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roger L. FOLEY, doing business as Foley's Tavern, Defendant-Respondent, et al., Defendant. (Appeal No. 2.)
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when another patron at the establishment of Roger L. Foley, doing business as Foley's Tavern (defendant), hit him in the face with a beer bottle. The State Liquor Authority, Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, thereafter charged defendant with violating Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106(6) by allowing his licensed premises to “become disorderly by suffering or permitting an altercation/assault to occur on the licensed premises.” Defendant pleaded no contest to that charge and an administrative penalty was imposed. We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion in limine, thereby precluding him from presenting evidence at trial with respect to defendant's plea of no contest. The plea concerned the incident that is the basis of this lawsuit, and defendant's “no contest plea ‘amounted to a waiver of a hearing and an admission of the facts as charged’ ” (Matter of Kufs v. State of N.Y. Liq. Auth., 224 A.D.2d 974, 637 N.Y.S.2d 846; see Matter of Pulaski Inn [New York State Liq. Auth.], 182 A.D.2d 1116, 583 N.Y.S.2d 705). We note, however, that defendant at trial must be given an opportunity to “explain his plea so that the jury may decide whether to give it any weight” (Cohens v. Hess, 248 A.D.2d 954, 954, 670 N.Y.S.2d 287, revd. on other grounds 92 N.Y.2d 511, 683 N.Y.S.2d 161, 705 N.E.2d 1202).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is denied.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 01, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)