Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James R. HOPKINS, Jr., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Gina GELIA, Respondent-Appellant.
Respondent mother appeals from an order modifying a prior order of joint custody by awarding petitioner father sole custody of the parties' children, with visitation to the mother. We agree with the mother that Family Court erred in entering the order upon “default” based on her failure to appear in court. The record establishes that the mother was represented by counsel, and we have previously determined that, “[w]here a party fails to appear for a hearing but is represented by counsel, the order is not one entered upon the default of the aggrieved party and appeal is not precluded” (Matter of Kwasi S., 221 A.D.2d 1029, 1030, 634 N.Y.S.2d 579; see also Matter of David A.A. v. Maryann A., 41 A.D.3d 1300, 837 N.Y.S.2d 479; Matter of Shemeco D., 265 A.D.2d 860, 695 N.Y.S.2d 799).
We further agree with the mother that the court erred in modifying the prior order without conducting a hearing. “ ‘Determinations affecting custody and visitation should be made following a full evidentiary hearing, not on the basis of conflicting allegations' ” (Matter of Kenneth M. v. Monique M., 48 A.D.3d 1174, 1174-1175, 851 N.Y.S.2d 315). Based upon the record before us, we are unable to determine whether the court “possessed sufficient information to render an informed determination that was consistent with the child[ren]'s best interests” (Matter of Almasi v. Bauer, 27 A.D.3d 1155, 1156, 813 N.Y.S.2d 590 [internal quotation marks omitted] ) and, indeed, the record is devoid of any indication that the court even considered the children's best interests. We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Family Court for a hearing on the petition. We note that, pending a new determination, the custody order entered October 6, 2005, as amended by the order entered September 12, 2006, remains in effect.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for a hearing on the petition.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: November 21, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)