Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Terry B. MINTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 seeking to vacate the judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30[2] ). We agree with defendant that County Court erred in denying the motion. The record reflects that the court failed to advise defendant at the time of the plea that his sentence would include a mandatory period of postrelease supervision. Subsequent to our decision affirming defendant's judgment of conviction (People v. Minter, 295 A.D.2d 927, 744 N.Y.S.2d 739, lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 712, 749 N.Y.S.2d 9, 778 N.E.2d 560), the Court of Appeals made clear that “a defendant pleading guilty to a determinate sentence must be aware of the postrelease supervision component of that sentence in order to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently choose among alternative courses of action, [and] the failure of a court to advise of postrelease supervision requires reversal of the conviction” (People v. Catu, 4 N.Y.3d 242, 245, 792 N.Y.S.2d 887, 825 N.E.2d 1081; see People v. Louree, 8 N.Y.3d 541, 838 N.Y.S.2d 18, 869 N.E.2d 18). Here, defendant “did not possess all the information necessary for an informed choice among different possible courses of action because [ ]he was not told that [ ]he would be subject to mandatory postrelease supervision as a consequence of [his] guilty plea. Accordingly, defendant's decision to plead guilty cannot be said to have been knowing, voluntary and intelligent” (People v. Van Deusen, 7 N.Y.3d 744, 746, 819 N.Y.S.2d 854, 853 N.E.2d 223). We therefore reverse the order, grant defendant's motion, vacate the judgment of conviction and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law, the motion is granted, the judgment of conviction is vacated and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 06, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)