Monroe County Attorney, Petitioner-Respondent. v. << (2003)

 Respondent appeals from an order that found that he had violated the conditions of probation imposed on a prior adjudication of juvenile delinquency.   Respondent contends that he was denied due process and equal protection because Family Court denied his request for a dispositional hearing.   That contention is not preserved for our review (see Matter of Jasen P.M., 289 A.D.2d 1033, 735 N.Y.S.2d 839) and, in any event, lacks merit.   It is well settled that “no new dispositional hearing is required upon a finding that a juvenile delinquent has violated the conditions of probation” (Matter of Edwin L., 88 N.Y.2d 593, 601, 648 N.Y.S.2d 850, 671 N.E.2d 1247, citing Family Ct Act § 360.3[6];  see Jasen P.M., 289 A.D.2d 1033, 735 N.Y.S.2d 839;  Matter of Vincent B., 239 A.D.2d 925, 926, 659 N.Y.S.2d 594).   Contrary to respondent's further contention, the court was not required to state its findings in open court.   The court complied with the requirements of the Family Ct Act by stating its findings in the written order (see § 352.2 [2][b];  [3] ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

MEMORANDUM: