SECORD v. Woodford Bros., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (1999)

 This is an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by Eric Secord (plaintiff) allegedly as a result of the negligence of defendant-third-party plaintiff, Willow Ridge Stables, Inc. (Willow Ridge), and its violation of the Labor Law. Willow Ridge, the owner of the premises, appeals from an order granting the motion of third-party defendant, the contractor that employed plaintiff, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 11.   Willow Ridge contends that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion with respect to those causes of action of the third-party complaint that seek contractual indemnification and damages for breach of an agreement to provide insurance.   We disagree.   The construction contract does not unambiguously and expressly require third-party defendant to indemnify Willow Ridge for work-related injuries to employees of third-party defendant (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 11;  see generally, Weissman v. Sinorm Deli, 88 N.Y.2d 437, 446, 646 N.Y.S.2d 308, 669 N.E.2d 242;  Hooper Assocs. v. AGS Computers, 74 N.Y.2d 487, 491-492, 549 N.Y.S.2d 365, 548 N.E.2d 903;  Margolin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 32 N.Y.2d 149, 153, 344 N.Y.S.2d 336, 297 N.E.2d 80).   Nor does the contract obligate third-party defendant to obtain insurance for the benefit of Willow Ridge (see generally, Kinney v. Lisk Co., 76 N.Y.2d 215, 219, 557 N.Y.S.2d 283, 556 N.E.2d 1090).

Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

MEMORANDUM: