Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Mark ANANIA, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis VERDGELINE, Defendant-Respondent.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when the vehicle he was driving was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by defendant. Supreme Court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). Defendant met his initial burden by submitting numerous records and reports of plaintiff's treating physicians indicating that plaintiff's alleged injuries were related to injuries suffered in two workplace accidents, one that occurred before and one that occurred after the accident at issue herein. “Because defendant submitted ‘persuasive evidence that plaintiff's alleged pain and injuries were related to a preexisting condition [and an intervening medical problem], plaintiff had the burden to come forward with evidence addressing defendant's claimed lack of causation’ ” (Clark v. Perry, 21 A.D.3d 1373, 1374, 801 N.Y.S.2d 645, quoting Carrasco v. Mendez, 4 N.Y.3d 566, 580, 797 N.Y.S.2d 380, 830 N.E.2d 278; see also McCarthy v. Bellamy, 39 A.D.3d 1166, 834 N.Y.S.2d 800), and plaintiff failed to meet that burden. Plaintiff's submissions in opposition to the motion did not “adequately address how plaintiff's current medical problems, in light of [plaintiff's] past medical history, are causally related to the subject accident” (Style v. Joseph, 32 A.D.3d 212, 214, 820 N.Y.S.2d 26). Although plaintiff's orthopedic surgeon stated that plaintiff's right carpal tunnel syndrome and resulting surgery approximately four years after the accident at issue herein were causally related to the accident, that surgeon's opinion was not supported by the requisite “ ‘competent medical evidence based upon objective medical findings and diagnostic tests' ” (Yoonessi v. Givens, 39 A.D.3d 1164, 1165, 836 N.Y.S.2d 388).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 23, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)