Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert SNIADECKI and Paula Sniadecki, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WESTFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Buffalo Sheet Metal, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiffs' motion seeking partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240(1) and to strike all affirmative defenses alleging the culpable conduct of Robert Sniadecki (plaintiff). The risks addressed by the statute are those “ ‘specific gravity-related accidents as falling from a height or being struck by a falling object that was improperly hoisted or inadequately secured’ ” (Melber v. 6333 Main St., 91 N.Y.2d 759, 763, 676 N.Y.S.2d 104, 698 N.E.2d 933, quoting Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 N.Y.2d 494, 501, 601 N.Y.S.2d 49, 618 N.E.2d 82). Here, plaintiff was standing on a 10-foot stepladder using a torch to cut pipe that ran along the ceiling, about 12 feet from the floor. Plaintiff was injured when an inadequately secured section of pipe swung down, striking plaintiff and the ladder and knocking plaintiff off the ladder to the floor. Plaintiffs met their initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that the injury was caused by the lack of enumerated safety devices, the proper placement and operation of which would have prevented the pipe from falling on plaintiff and plaintiff from falling off the ladder (see, Stang v. Garbellano, 262 A.D.2d 853, 692 N.Y.S.2d 229; Panattoni v. Inducon Park Assocs., 247 A.D.2d 823, 668 N.Y.S.2d 840; Severino v. Schuyler Meadows Club, 225 A.D.2d 954, 956, 639 N.Y.S.2d 869). Defendants Westfield Central School District and Buffalo Sheet Metal., Inc. failed to raise a triable issue of fact concerning whether plaintiff's actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident (see, Weininger v. Hagedorn & Co., 91 N.Y.2d 958, 960, 672 N.Y.S.2d 840, 695 N.E.2d 709, rearg. denied 92 N.Y.2d 875, 677 N.Y.S.2d 777, 700 N.E.2d 317; Karas v. Corning Hosp. [appeal No. 1], 262 A.D.2d 1039, 692 N.Y.S.2d 626; Sopha v. Combustion Eng'g, 261 A.D.2d 911, 911-912, 690 N.Y.S.2d 813).
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 10, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)