Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Alan BRANDT, Petitioner-Appellant, For an Order, etc., v. Ramon C. CORTINES, etc., et al., Respondents-Respondents.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Hansel McGee, J.), entered November 2, 1995, which denied petitioner's application to declare the August 19, 1994 discontinuance of petitioner's service as probationary principal of Intermediate School 193 null and void and to direct his retroactive reinstatement and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Chancellor properly exercised his authority pursuant to Education Law § 2590-l when he superseded Community School Board 12 and appointed trustees who effected discontinuance of petitioner's service (see, Community School Bd. 26, Queens v. Macchiarola, 99 Misc.2d 219, 415 N.Y.S.2d 776; Matter of Robinson v Trustees of Community Bd. 12, Sup Ct, Bronx County, March 7, 1994, Modesto, J., Index No. 18363/93; Moolenaar v. Fernandez, Sup Ct, Bronx County, Aug. 30, 1993, Levy, J., Index No. 8929/93). As “maintenance of public confidence in the integrity of the administration of the schools is of concern to the entire city” (Lavelle v. Quinones, 679 F.Supp. 253, 259), the refusal by the Community School Board to terminate petitioner's probationary service, after a report by the Board of Education School Under Registration Review team issued a report describing severe deficiencies in leadership, professional development and instruction in the school and after a recommendation by the Chancellor to discontinue petitioner's service, undermined citywide educational policy, and thus justified respondents' actions herein.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 04, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)