Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ian ABELSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J. at jury trial and sentence; Maxwell Wiley, J. at resentence), rendered October 24, 2002, as amended March 14, 2005, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 years, 5 years and 2 1/313 to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's request for a missing witness charge as to the victim's former girlfriend. The court correctly concluded that this witness was not under the People's control for purposes of a missing witness charge (see People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424, 428-429, 509 N.Y.S.2d 796, 502 N.E.2d 583 [1986]; compare People v. Keen, 94 N.Y.2d 533, 539-540, 707 N.Y.S.2d 380, 728 N.E.2d 979 [2000] ). The victim's brief relationship with the witness ended long before the trial, and he had not heard from her for several months. In addition, the People sufficiently established that this witness, a prostitute living at an unknown location in Italy, was not available, in that efforts to locate her would have been futile (see e.g. People v. Delacruz, 276 A.D.2d 387, 714 N.Y.S.2d 277 [2000], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 758, 725 N.Y.S.2d 284, 748 N.E.2d 1080 [2001] ). In any event, were we to find any error in failing to give the missing witness charge, we would find the error to be harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 16, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)