Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ARDEN JERMAINE H. and Another, Dependent Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Delores Marie S., et al., Respondents–Appellants, McMahon Services For Children, Petitioner–Respondent.
Orders, Family Court, New York County (Sara P. Schechter, J.), entered on or about March 4 and 14, 2005, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated respondents' parental rights to the subject children and committed the children's guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The findings of permanent neglect are supported by clear and convincing evidence that despite the agency's diligent efforts, respondent father failed to realistically plan for the children's future (Social Services Law § 384–b[7][a], [c]; see Matter of Gregory B., 74 N.Y.2d 77, 89–90, 544 N.Y.S.2d 535, 542 N.E.2d 1052 [1989] ), and respondent mother missed several visits, was late for others, had poor-quality interaction with the children at certain visits, failed to attend a service plan review, and failed to complete her service plan within the statutorily relevant period (Social Services Law § 384–b[7][a], [b]; see Matter of Pearl M.A., 13 A.D.3d 141, 786 N.Y.S.2d 470 [2004]; cf. Matter of Christian Lee R., 9 A.D.3d 275, 779 N.Y.S.2d 483 [2004] ). The parents' challenges to the agency's diligent efforts in large part raise issues of credibility that were properly resolved by Family Court (see Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 [1982] ). A preponderance of the evidence supports the findings that it would be in the children's best interests to be adopted by their respective foster mothers, who are their biological grandmothers, and that it would not be in their best interests to suspend judgment. Such disposition, in these particular circumstances, is not precluded by the fact that the children will live in separate homes (see Matter of Olimpia M. v. Steven M., 228 A.D.2d 270, 643 N.Y.S.2d 584 [1996] ). We have considered respondents' other arguments and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: October 05, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)