Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Toby GRAHAM, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J. at hearing; Arlene R. Silverman, J. at plea and sentence), rendered January 6, 2006, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 1 1/212 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761, 395 N.Y.S.2d 635, 363 N.E.2d 1380 [1977] ). After seeing defendant driving backwards and going the wrong way on a one-way street, the police made a lawful stop for a traffic infraction. As they approached the car, an officer saw defendant bending forward at the waist, as if to either secrete or obtain something. The officer properly asked defendant to step out of the car, and noticed that defendant was nervously fidgeting with his lower pants leg near his ankle, a possible location for a weapon. These observations, coupled with the officer's observation of defendant leaning when his car was stopped, provided reasonable suspicion justifying a frisk (see People v. Crespo, 292 A.D.2d 177, 739 N.Y.S.2d 365 [2002], lv. denied 98 N.Y.2d 709, 749 N.Y.S.2d 6, 778 N.E.2d 557 [2002] ). When the officer touched defendant's ankle and felt a hard object that he reasonably believed could be a weapon, he was entitled, at the very least, to ask defendant the identity of the object (see e.g. People v. Alvarez, 308 A.D.2d 184, 188, 764 N.Y.S.2d 42 [2003], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 657, 782 N.Y.S.2d 699, 816 N.E.2d 572 [2004] ), which turned out to be a package of drugs.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 05, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)