Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of Stephen M. DALY, et al., Petitioners, For a Judgment, etc., v. William J. BRATTON, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Determination of respondent Police Commissioner dated November 2, 1995, which dismissed petitioner Steven M. Daly from his position as a police officer, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of remitting the matter to respondent for a determination of the amount of any monies owed petitioner and any deductions for outside compensation, the petition otherwise denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Carol Huff, J.], entered June 19, 1996), otherwise disposed of by confirming the remainder of the determination, without costs.
Respondents' determination that petitioner sexually harassed a fellow officer over a lengthy period of time and, on one occasion, threatened to throw her off the roof of a building for lodging complaints against him is supported by substantial evidence. The penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to our sense of fairness (Trotta v. Ward, 77 N.Y.2d 827, 566 N.Y.S.2d 199, 567 N.E.2d 241). As respondents concede, petitioner may be entitled to monies owed him prior to his termination. Since the record on appeal is insufficient to determine such amount, we remit for such determination (see, Matter of Cohen v. Bratton, 232 A.D.2d 304, 648 N.Y.S.2d 588). We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and requests for relief and find them to be without merit.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 23, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)